Named Outreach Recommendations
Off-page recommendations name the specific site to approach, what it is costing you, and how to approach that kind of site.
A recommendation that says "sites cite your competitors" is true but not something you can act on Monday morning. Knowing a problem exists is not the same as knowing what to do about it, and a vague nudge toward more outreach tends to just sit there unactioned.
Recommendations name the actual site. If a domain has cited a competitor seven times while never mentioning you, you see that domain by name, the exact number of answers where it happened, and what share of its total citations skipped you entirely. That number is the reason to spend an afternoon on it, not a hunch — a count from your own scan history.
The suggested approach changes with the type of site, because doing outreach means something different depending on who you are pitching. A review platform is a profile to claim and fill out. An editorial site is a specific journalist to email with a specific angle. A community forum is a discussion to join honestly, not seed artificially, and the guidance is written that way on purpose, since the shortcut version of that advice breaks most platforms rules and can get an account banned.
Up to five targets are shown at a time, ranked by how much they are actually costing you, so the list reads as a short plan for the week rather than a data dump to sort through yourself.